![]() ![]() The empirical results do not show appointed judges performing at a higher level than their elected counterparts. The measures permit a test of the relationship between performance and the four primary methods of state high court judge selection: partisan election, non-partisan election, merit plan, and appointment. Using a dataset of state high court opinions, we construct objective measures for three aspects of judicial performance: effort, skill and independence. ![]() In a paper published for the University of Chicago Law School in 2010 titled "Professionals or Politicians: The Uncertain Empirical Case for an Elected Rather Than Appointed Judiciary," the authors wrote: “ Judicial selection methods in intermediate appellate and general jurisdiction courtsĬombination of assisted appointment and other methodsĪrguments in support of partisan elections The chart below details selection methods at these court levels across the country. In selecting judges for the intermediate appellate and general jurisdiction courts, eight states use partisan elections for at least one type of court. Intermediate appellate and general jurisdiction courts Judicial selection methods in state supreme courts The chart below details selection methods in state supreme courts across the country. The map below highlights selection methods in state supreme courts across the country. States using this method State supreme courtsĪt the state supreme court level, the following states use this selection method: Alabama, Illinois, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. New York: Voters election party convention delegates who choose the party's general election candidates. ![]() If no candidate receives more than 50% of the vote, the top two vote-getters (regardless of party) advance to a general election.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
February 2023
Categories |